Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Week of October 27, Thursday Blog Post

Mary Astell is perhaps the first rhetor I have came across this semester that began her career by publishing anonymously. Although she was writing during the Enlightenment era I understand that woman rhetors were still not common and as a result were forced to either write anonymously or through a male name if they ever wished to get published. Nevertheless, I appreciated the change she tried to instill by proposing the foundation of a woman’s college. In my opinion, this attempt easily marks women’s first attempts at striving for an education. Along with her college proposition, her Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Part II was a powerful call to action for woman that I found encouraging. Not only does Astell provide an inspiring proposal to woman, but she also dictates that woman are capable of turning an advantage into demonstration of ability towards woman. Astell asks woman, “Why does not a generous Emulation fire your hearts and inspire you with Noble and Becoming Resentment?” In her proposal she claims that the only reason men have created a prejudice towards woman is because woman themselves have allowed this to happen. If they want equality then they essentially have to demand it. Unless woman begin to start demanding change they are going to continue to being condemned in foolishness and shame.

            In chapter four of her text Astell introduces her philosophies. Primarily, she instills upon the idea of natural logic. The manner in which she introduced her opinion slightly implied that as a rhetor she has been proven wrong in the past. Again, Astell is the only rhetor I have read to actually admit wrongdoings in the sense of philosophy. She claims that if your argument is eventually challenged and corrected by another “the most we can say for our selves when the weakness of our Arguments comes to be discover’d is that we were mistaken thro Rashness or Ignorance.” Personally, I believe this idea damages her credibility as a rhetor since it demonstrates that she has argued falsely before.

No comments:

Post a Comment